[PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Fri Apr 8 00:17:21 PDT 2016
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > > The consumer of max77693 regulators on Trats2 board (samsung-usb2-phy
> > > driver) supports deferred probing so the max77693 main MFD driver can be
> > > built now as a module. This gives more flexibility and removes manual
> > > ordering of init calls.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
> > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 14 ++------------
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > I assume this can be taken immediately and doesn't depend on anything
> > external to the set?
> >
> > For my own reference:
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, this can be taken as is. Only second patch (changing defconfig)
> depends on this. I can take the second patch through samsung tree but
> that would require a tag/branch with this... which looks like an
> overkill. So maybe you would take both?
If I take the defconfig patch without a tag, there will almost
certainly be merge conflicts. Other solutions include; delaying the
defconfig patch for one cycle or trying to get it in post -rc1.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list