[PATCH V2 1/9] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption
Baicar, Tyler
tbaicar at codeaurora.org
Wed Apr 6 13:43:04 PDT 2016
Hello Suzuki,
On 4/6/2016 9:53 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 06/04/16 16:12, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> + hest_hdr = (struct acpi_hest_header *)generic;
>> + if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2) {
>> + ghes->generic_v2 = (struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *)generic;
>> + rc = apei_map_generic_address(
>> + &ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto err_unmap;
>> + } else
>> + ghes->generic_v2 = NULL;
> ...
>> err_unmap:
>> apei_unmap_generic_address(&generic->error_status_address);
>> + if (ghes->generic_v2)
>> + apei_unmap_generic_address(
>> + &ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
>> err_free:
>> kfree(ghes);
>> return ERR_PTR(rc);
>> @@ -279,6 +295,9 @@ static void ghes_fini(struct ghes *ghes)
>> {
>> kfree(ghes->estatus);
>> apei_unmap_generic_address(&ghes->generic->error_status_address);
>> + if (ghes->generic_v2)
>> + apei_unmap_generic_address(
>> + &ghes->generic_v2->error_status_address);
>
> I am not familiar with the APEI code, but is this error_status_address or
> read_ack_register ? We don't seem to be mapping error_status_address
> in generic_v2 header
> which is introduced in this patch ? Am I missing something ?
>
> Suzuki
Thank you for your feedback. This does look like an error; it should be
&ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register. The variable
&ghes->generic_v2->error_status_address is the same as
&ghes->generic->error_status_address which is unmapped on the line above
the if statement here.
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list