[PATCH v2 2/5] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: clear BAM interrupt only if it is rised

Vinod Koul vinod.koul at intel.com
Tue Apr 5 16:41:47 PDT 2016

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:56:19AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:

s/rised/raised ?

> Currently we write BAM_IRQ_CLR register with zero even when no
> BAM_IRQ occured. This write has some bad side effects when the
> BAM instance is for the crypto engine. In case of crypto engine
> some of the BAM registers are xPU protected and they cannot be
> controlled by the driver.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list