[PATCH v2 02/16] arm64: dts: add sp804 timer node for Hi6220
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Sun Apr 3 22:16:35 PDT 2016
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:23:42PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Guodong Xu <guodong.xu at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> >
> > Add sp804 timer for hi6220, so it can be used as broadcast timer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5 at hisilicon.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > index ad1f1eb..82c4756 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> > @@ -209,5 +209,14 @@
> > clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > +
> > + dual_timer0: dual_timer at f8008000 {
timer at ...
> > + compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xf8008000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&ao_ctrl 27>;
> > + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>
> How can this work? You only give the apb_pclk for clocking the
> bus to the timer.
>
> Most platforms using this driver has something like this:
>
> timer01: timer at 10104000 {
> compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell";
> reg = <0x10104000 0x1000>;
> interrupt-parent = <&intc_dc1176>;
> interrupts = <0 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <0 9
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> clocks = <&timclk>, <&timclk>, <&pclk>;
> clock-names = "timer1", "timer2", "apb_pclk";
> };
>
> It then reads the two clocks in the beginning of clocks() to
> determine the frequency of each timer.
>
> By chance the code in the driver will allow just one clock and
> will then assume that both the bus to the timer and the timer
> itself is clocked from the same clock. But I highly doubt that this
> is the case.
I believe 1 clock was allowed for early bindings, but yes it should be
3.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list