[PATCH V3 1/1] ARM : missing corrupted reg in __div64_32
Dave Martin
Dave.Martin at arm.com
Fri Apr 1 01:56:35 PDT 2016
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:22:11PM +0800, chengang wrote:
> __xl(R0 in little endian system, or R1 in big endian system) is corrupted
> after calling __do_div64 and compiler is not informed about this.
> If n is used again afterwards, __xl won't be reloaded and n will
> contain incorrect value.
You should briefly explain the fix here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gangchen at rdamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <changeang.beijing at outlook.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> index e1f0776..8d1b49a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> @@ -21,30 +21,24 @@
> * for arguments and results (beware).
> */
>
> -#ifdef __ARMEB__
> -#define __xh "r0"
> -#define __xl "r1"
> -#else
> -#define __xl "r0"
> -#define __xh "r1"
> -#endif
These defines aren't used by anything else, right?
I grepped for them, but I didn't see any other matches.
>
> static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> {
> register unsigned int __base asm("r4") = base;
> register unsigned long long __n asm("r0") = *n;
> register unsigned long long __res asm("r2");
> - register unsigned int __rem asm(__xh);
> - asm( __asmeq("%0", __xh)
> + asm( __asmeq("%0", "r0")
> __asmeq("%1", "r2")
> - __asmeq("%2", "r0")
> - __asmeq("%3", "r4")
> + __asmeq("%2", "r4")
> "bl __do_div64"
> - : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res)
> - : "r" (__n), "r" (__base)
> + : "+r" (__n), "=r" (__res)
> + : "r" (__base)
> : "ip", "lr", "cc");
> *n = __res;
> - return __rem;
> + /*
> + * rem is saved at the up half of __n, see __do_div64 for more
> + */
Minor nit:
It's useful to have a comment here, but rem is gone, and you might want
to say "upper half", e.g., something like:
/* __do_div returns the remainder in the upper word of __n: */
> + return __n >> 32;
> }
> #define __div64_32 __div64_32
>
> --
> 2.4.3
Cheers
---Dave
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list