[PATCH v2 3/4] clk: bcm2835: Add support for programming the audio domain clocks.
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Mon Sep 28 14:19:43 PDT 2015
Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> writes:
> On 09/10/2015 02:58 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> This adds support for enabling, disabling, and setting the rate of the
>> audio domain clocks. It will be necessary for setting the pixel clock
>> for HDMI in the VC4 driver and let us write a cpufreq driver. It will
>> also improve compatibility with user changes to the firmware's
>> config.txt, since our previous fixed clocks are unaware of it.
>>
>> The firmware also has support for configuring the clocks through the
>> mailbox channel, but the pixel clock setup by the firmware doesn't
>> work, and it's Raspberry Pi specific anyway. The only conflicts we
>> should have with the firmware would be if we made firmware calls that
>> result in clock management (like opening firmware V3D or ISP access,
>> which we don't support in upstream), or on hardware over-thermal or
>> under-voltage (when the firmware would rewrite PLLB to take the ARM
>> out of overclock). If that happens, our cached .recalc_rate() results
>> would be incorrect, but that's no worse than our current state where
>> we used fixed clocks.
>>
>> The existing fixed clocks in the code are left in place to provide
>> backwards compatibility with old device tree files.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
>> +static const struct bcm2835_pll_ana_bits bcm2835_ana_default = {
>> + 0,
>> + 0,
>> + ~((7 << 19) | (15 << 15)),
>> + (2 << 19) | (8 << 15),
>> + ~(7 << 7),
>> + (6 << 1),
>> +
>> + 14
>
> Nit: Elide the blank line? In some other structs too.
>
> Are there #defines or names you can use for those initializers?
I've just used named initializers instad. (These *are* the defines, so
another indirection wouldn't help anyone reading the driver).
>> + clks[BCM2835_PLLA] = bcm2835_register_pll(cprman, &bcm2835_plla_data);
>> + clks[BCM2835_PLLB] = bcm2835_register_pll(cprman, &bcm2835_pllb_data);
>
> These can fail; shouldn't there be error-checking? Or, does
> of_clk_add_provider() check for this?
When you get the clk from the of provider, the error gets passed
through, like it should.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150928/8775cabd/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list