[Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Al Stone <al.stone at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 07:50 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 28/09/15 14:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>
>>>> On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Marc Zyngier (5):
>>>>>>   acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure
>>>>>>   irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips
>>>>>>   irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing
>>>>>>   clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based
>>>>>>     clocksources
>>>>>>   clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the
>>>>> first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and
>>>>> clocksource-related patches.
>>>>
>>>> Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series
>>>> later today.
>>>>
>>>>> Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY
>>>>> (currently in my bleeding-edge branch).
>>>>
>>>> Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you
>>>> have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are
>>>> still aimed at 4.4)?
>>>
>>> The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing
>>> regression.
>>>
>>> I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his
>>> next version on them.
>>
>> OK. I'll rebase them on the current bleeding-edge, and post that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>       M.
>>
>
> Yeah, sorry about that; I had some bad info from the 1.0 version of the ACPI
> spec.  And I was busy with family stuff all weekend.
>
> Rafael, I'll look for Marc's patches to show up in bleeding-edge and rebase on
> top of that.

Sounds good, thanks!

Rafael