[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: The n clockdiv factor is 0 based on sunxi SoCs
Olliver Schinagl
oliver+list at schinagl.nl
Sun Sep 27 09:05:35 PDT 2015
Hey Hans,
On 27-09-15 16:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
> According to the datasheets to n factor for dividing the tclk is
> 2 to the power n on Allwinner SoCs, not 2 to the power n + 1 as it is
> on other mv64xxx implementations.
Ah!
>
> I've contacted Allwinner about this and they have confirmed that the
> datasheet is correct.
>
> This commit fixes the clk-divider calculations for Allwinner SoCs
> accordingly.
So this explains why all my i2c frequenties are double of what I setup.
Thanks for taking the time of figuring it out! I'll give it a test
hopefully soon.
Olliver
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> index 30059c1..e75cf6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ struct mv64xxx_i2c_data {
> bool errata_delay;
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> bool irq_clear_inverted;
> + /* Clk div is 2 to the power n, not 2 to the power n + 1 */
> + bool clk_n_base_0;
> };
>
> static struct mv64xxx_i2c_regs mv64xxx_i2c_regs_mv64xxx = {
> @@ -759,25 +761,29 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mv64xxx_i2c_of_match_table);
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
> static int
> -mv64xxx_calc_freq(const int tclk, const int n, const int m)
> +mv64xxx_calc_freq(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,
> + const int tclk, const int n, const int m)
> {
> - return tclk / (10 * (m + 1) * (2 << n));
> + if (drv_data->clk_n_base_0)
> + return tclk / (10 * (m + 1) * (1 << n));
> + else
> + return tclk / (10 * (m + 1) * (2 << n));
> }
>
> static bool
> -mv64xxx_find_baud_factors(const u32 req_freq, const u32 tclk, u32 *best_n,
> - u32 *best_m)
> +mv64xxx_find_baud_factors(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,
> + const u32 req_freq, const u32 tclk)
> {
> int freq, delta, best_delta = INT_MAX;
> int m, n;
>
> for (n = 0; n <= 7; n++)
> for (m = 0; m <= 15; m++) {
> - freq = mv64xxx_calc_freq(tclk, n, m);
> + freq = mv64xxx_calc_freq(drv_data, tclk, n, m);
> delta = req_freq - freq;
> if (delta >= 0 && delta < best_delta) {
> - *best_m = m;
> - *best_n = n;
> + drv_data->freq_m = m;
> + drv_data->freq_n = n;
> best_delta = delta;
> }
> if (best_delta == 0)
> @@ -815,8 +821,11 @@ mv64xxx_of_config(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data,
> if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &bus_freq))
> bus_freq = 100000; /* 100kHz by default */
>
> - if (!mv64xxx_find_baud_factors(bus_freq, tclk,
> - &drv_data->freq_n, &drv_data->freq_m)) {
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c"))
> + drv_data->clk_n_base_0 = true;
> +
> + if (!mv64xxx_find_baud_factors(drv_data, bus_freq, tclk)) {
> rc = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list