[PATCH 1/3] Documentation: dt: keystone: provide SoC specific compatible flags
santosh shilimkar
santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com
Fri Sep 25 09:15:21 PDT 2015
9/25/2015 9:01 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 10:18 AM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
>> On 9/25/2015 7:50 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> [...]
>>> But, how about userspace
>>> needing to know which SoC they are on, without needing to depend on
>>> board->soc mapping? How do we help resolve that?
>>>
>> Why the user space should care about exact SOC ?
>
> examples vary - trivial one is: debug tools like omapconf[1] or testing
> tools like opentest[2] need some standard way to ensure Linux kernel is
> functional - trusting the least set of parameters is usually what we
> would prefer. while building a generic distro such as debian or yocto,
> one prefers NOT to need to do a package build per SoC/perboard - that
> never scales. instead, you'd like the same application run on different
> systems dynamically.
>
I guessed omapconf example is coming though Keystone has no such tool
yet ;-). Opentest shouldn't need that info either.
I do agree that having a soc along with board is useful in
longer run to accommodation more boards and variants.
And only on that merit, I am willing to take these patches.
Please refresh the series commit messages based on the
discussion so far and repost. Will pick it up then.
Regards,
Santosh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list