[PATCH v2 2/2] input: gpio_keys_polled: Add support for abs/rel axis

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 20-09-15 22:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
> <I seem to have deleted the original mail without reply-ing, so from a threaded mailer pov this is a top-post, sorry>
>
> Hi,
>
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>  > > +    for_each_set_bit(i, input->relbit, REL_CNT) {
>  > > +        if (!test_bit(i, bdev->rel_axis_seen))
>  > > +            input_event(input, EV_REL, i, 0);
>  > > +    }
>  >
>  > I wonder if this should be written as
>  >
>  >    for_each_set_bit(i, bdev->rel_axis_seen, REL_CNT)
>  >        input_event(input, EV_REL, i, 0);
>  >
>  > i.e. the 2nd bit test is not really needed because we should not see
>  > unsupported bits in "seen" axes.
>
> Yes that makes sense, I'll make this change, re-test and post a new version.

Erm, correction, no we cannot do this, because the second check is inverted.

What this loop does is set axis to 0 for axis for which no buttons are pressed,
so the if is:

	if (!test_bit(i, bdev->rel_axis_seen))

Because seen axis have already had a value set and we should not
override that, and this is something which only want to do for axis
which we support, so this has to stay as is.

So I'll fixup the bindings to mention the negative value thingie, and
then do a v3 of only that one.

Regards,

Hans



>
>  > > +        if (fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "linux,input-value",
>  > > +                         (u32 *)&button->value))
>  > > +            button->value = 1;
>  >
>  > Umm, we need negative values too... but there is no
>  > fwnode_property_read_s32 :(. We need to document in the bindings that
>  > value is treated as signed so that users can still achieve the needed
>  > effect.
>
> Right, I was looking how to deal with this, and the generic fwnode
> interface has no s32 version, but the devicetree  linux/of.h code has:
>
> static inline int of_property_read_s32(const struct device_node *np,
>                                         const char *propname,
>                                         s32 *out_value)
> {
>          return of_property_read_u32(np, propname, (u32*) out_value);
> }
>
> So this seemed like the best way to deal with this. You're right that
> the devicetree binding docs should explicitly state that negative
> numbers are allowed though, I will update the dt-bindings doc
> patch accordingly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>