[PATCH v2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Don't use dma_to_phys()
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Sep 17 09:42:16 PDT 2015
In checking whether DMA addresses differ from physical addresses, using
dma_to_phys() is actually the wrong thing to do, since it may hide any
DMA offset, which is precisely one of the things we are checking for.
Simply casting between the two address types, whilst ugly, is in fact
the appropriate course of action. Further care (and ugliness) is also
necessary in the comparison to avoid truncation if phys_addr_t and
dma_addr_t differ in size.
We can also reject any device with a fixed DMA offset up-front at page
table creation, leaving the allocation-time check for the more subtle
cases like bounce buffering due to an incorrect DMA mask.
Furthermore, we can then fix the hackish KConfig dependency so that
architectures without a dma_to_phys() implementation may still
COMPILE_TEST (or even use!) the code. The true dependency is on the
DMA API, so use the appropriate symbol for that.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 3 +--
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
index 4664c2a..3dc1bcb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ config IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE
config IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
bool "ARMv7/v8 Long Descriptor Format"
select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE
- # SWIOTLB guarantees a dma_to_phys() implementation
- depends on ARM || ARM64 || (COMPILE_TEST && SWIOTLB)
+ depends on HAS_DMA && (ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST)
help
Enable support for the ARM long descriptor pagetable format.
This allocator supports 4K/2M/1G, 16K/32M and 64K/512M page
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
index 73c0748..96a4baa 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
@@ -202,9 +202,9 @@ typedef u64 arm_lpae_iopte;
static bool selftest_running = false;
-static dma_addr_t __arm_lpae_dma_addr(struct device *dev, void *pages)
+static dma_addr_t __arm_lpae_dma_addr(void *pages)
{
- return phys_to_dma(dev, virt_to_phys(pages));
+ return (dma_addr_t)virt_to_phys(pages);
}
static void *__arm_lpae_alloc_pages(size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
@@ -223,10 +223,10 @@ static void *__arm_lpae_alloc_pages(size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
goto out_free;
/*
* We depend on the IOMMU being able to work with any physical
- * address directly, so if the DMA layer suggests it can't by
- * giving us back some translation, that bodes very badly...
+ * address directly, so if the DMA layer suggests otherwise by
+ * translating or truncating them, that bodes very badly...
*/
- if (dma != __arm_lpae_dma_addr(dev, pages))
+ if (dma != virt_to_phys(pages))
goto out_unmap;
}
@@ -243,10 +243,8 @@ out_free:
static void __arm_lpae_free_pages(void *pages, size_t size,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
{
- struct device *dev = cfg->iommu_dev;
-
if (!selftest_running)
- dma_unmap_single(dev, __arm_lpae_dma_addr(dev, pages),
+ dma_unmap_single(cfg->iommu_dev, __arm_lpae_dma_addr(pages),
size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
free_pages_exact(pages, size);
}
@@ -254,12 +252,11 @@ static void __arm_lpae_free_pages(void *pages, size_t size,
static void __arm_lpae_set_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, arm_lpae_iopte pte,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
{
- struct device *dev = cfg->iommu_dev;
-
*ptep = pte;
if (!selftest_running)
- dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, __arm_lpae_dma_addr(dev, ptep),
+ dma_sync_single_for_device(cfg->iommu_dev,
+ __arm_lpae_dma_addr(ptep),
sizeof(pte), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
}
@@ -629,6 +626,11 @@ arm_lpae_alloc_pgtable(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
if (cfg->oas > ARM_LPAE_MAX_ADDR_BITS)
return NULL;
+ if (cfg->iommu_dev->dma_pfn_offset) {
+ dev_err(cfg->iommu_dev, "Cannot accommodate DMA offset for IOMMU page tables\n");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data)
return NULL;
--
1.9.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list