[PATCH] arm64: add cpu_idle tracepoints to arch_cpu_idle
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Wed Sep 16 09:16:05 PDT 2015
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Dear Lorenzo,
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:53:12 +0800
> Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at marvell.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Lorenzo,
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:47:38 +0100
> > Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:23:21PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > Currently, if cpuidle is disabled or not supported, powertop reports
> > > > zero wakeups and zero events. This is due to the cpu_idle tracepoints
> > > > are missing.
> > > >
> > > > This patch is to make cpu_idle tracepoints always available even if
> > > > cpuidle is disabled or not supported.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at marvell.com>
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why this code cannot be moved to the generic idle loop ?
> >
> > Do you mean the cpu_idle_loop() in kernel/sched/idle.c? To be honest, I
>
> Maybe I know now. we need to trace different idle level, for example:
>
> WFI idle: trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, ...);
>
> deeper idle: trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(2, ...);
>
> Usually, the first argument of trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle() equals to the index
> of the idle level.
>
> so generic idle loop is not a good candidate.
You are adding a trace for tracing state 1 (ie default idle state),
called from arch_cpu_idle(), which is the default idle call when the
CPUidle framework is not available, so I suggested moving the traces
you add to arm/arm64 arch_cpu_idle() calls to kernel/sched/idle.c
(see default_idle_call()) instead of patching architecture code.
I think you can't do that because on x86 calling arch_cpu_idle()
does not always mean entering idle state index 1 if I read the code
correctly (in particular the mwait based implementation - mwait_idle()).
So never mind, patch is fine (on arm64, on arm you should be careful
because some arm_pm_idle implementations trace state 1 already -
see omap3_pm_idle and if you add traces to arch_cpu_idle you should
remove the traces from mach implementations).
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list