[PATCH] arm64: hw_breakpoint: use target state to determine ABI behaviour
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Wed Sep 16 02:09:11 PDT 2015
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:43:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:16:13PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > > index bba85c8f8037..2926c3dd6479 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > > @@ -163,6 +163,12 @@ enum hw_breakpoint_ops {
> > > HW_BREAKPOINT_RESTORE
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static int is_compat_bp(struct perf_event *bp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct task_struct *tsk = bp->hw.target;
> > > + return tsk && is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk));
> > > +}
> >
> > What are the conditions for tsk == NULL?
>
> If you create a per-cpu breakpoint (i.e. a breakpoint that isn't affine
> to a task), then the target is NULL. These can only be created by the
> perf_event_open syscall, not from ptrace.
OK, so can sys_perf_event_open() be called from a compat task? If that's
the case, is_compat_bp() should do:
if (tsk)
return is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk));
else
return is_compat_task();
and a comment on why this is (not) needed. Your patch changes the
current code behaviour when tsk == NULL.
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list