[PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Sudeep Holla
sudeep.holla at arm.com
Fri Sep 11 01:49:43 PDT 2015
On 10/09/15 21:43, Al Stone wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 10:20 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> From the code inspection, I can see we have 3 users of acpi_parse_entries not
>> just MADT but also PCC and NUMA/SRAT
>>
>> Something like this solves this issue:
>> - if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + if (!strncmp(id, ACPI_SIG_MADT, 4) &&
>> + bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry)
>>
>>
>> Or am I still missing something ?
>
> Nope, I missed it. Your fix above will solve the problem; I misunderstood
> how acpi_parse_entries() was being used -- somehow I had it in my head that
> only MADT was in use, and just not seeing that it's being used for several
> other subtable traversals also. Sorry about that, Sudeep. My mistake.
>
No worries.
> I'll add this fix for a v4, but I'll wait for a few days to see if I get any
> additional comments -- I haven't heard from any x86, ia64 or ACPI maintainers
Makes sense.
> yet. OTOH, it's nice to know we've already found and fixed two sets of arm64
> ACPI tables that are in error by using these patches, even with the flaws :).
>
Very much true indeed :)
Regards,
Sudeep
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list