[PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier code
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Sep 9 02:52:45 PDT 2015
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
> On 9/8/2015 20:23, Mark Brown wrote:
> >If you want to have three controls you need to write code so that the
> >user can only change one of them from 0dB at once, returning an error
> >otherwise. That was why it looked like they were three separate
> >controls.
> If user operates two or tree controls at the same time, for my
> understanding, these operations are serial actually in kernel, not parallel,
> and the last operation will be effective. I only write the function
> 'classd_get_eq_enum' to get the enumeration value, if user changes one of
> controls, the other controls will get 0dB. Is my understanding correct?
Yes, that's what's going to end up happening but it's not how controls
are expected to behave - applications will expect changing one control
to leave others unaffected so it's better to return an error rather than
change the other control.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150909/a105d0ce/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list