[PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable USB Video Class support
Javier Martinez Canillas
javier at osg.samsung.com
Wed Sep 9 00:41:07 PDT 2015
On 09/09/2015 02:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08.09.2015 22:32, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Let me rephrase my question into:
>>> 1. What is worth enabling in exynos_defconfig? USB devices? I would
>>> argue, except they are needed to boot.
>> Ok, I understand your concern. The question is where we draw the line.
>>> So maybe enable everything which Exynos boards have hard-wired? That
>>> would make some sense... but we're making kernel larger.
>> In the case of this WebCam, it's not a typical USB device in the sense
>> that is built in the Chromebook and not something that's plugged on an
>> external USB port.
> Right, that is the difference from regular USB devices.
>>> 2. Maybe enable only what is a typical use case (including typical
>>> testing cases)? Then we would have to define what "typical" means. For
>>> example battery would be typical but camera would not.
>> There are a lot of board specific drivers that we currently enable as
>> built-in like hwmon sensors or iio devices that are likely only present
>> on a single board or a family of boards.
>> So then I think all those drivers should be changed as a module as well,
>> unless are critical for the board operation (i.e: thermal or fan drivers).
> Actually I think we should not judge by number of board using given
> component but its usefulness in general exynos_defconfig case. Even when
> something is used on just one board but it is important for that board,
> then it should be built-in.
> For example hwmon monitoring stuff to get information about board
> condition. Other example are leds on Odroid - to get visible condition
> of the board.
> This don't have to be critical, but just important for testing.
> Additionally such components can be accessed usually from limited
> user-space, e.g. system booted to console or SSH.
> If using a component requires more complex user-space (e.g. any kind of
> window system), then probably already modules could be easily used. In
> such cases I would expect the boot is not from network but from MMC and
> there is a full-blown distro working.
Ok, fair enough.
>>> 3. Argh, so maybe, if we agree that not everything is worth being
>>> enabled, that additional stuff could be build as module?
>> Yes, I don't see anything wrong to enable more stuff as a module if
>> that will give more build / test coverage.
>> The goal of kernelci is to add functional tests so besides testing
>> if a given kernel booted correctly, it's going to test if for example
>> USB enumeration is working and has no regressions. For that use case
>> is interesting to have support for the built-in USB devices like this
>> camera (either as built-in or as a module).
> Okay, so we have some agreement that other stuff which is not important
> but still hard-wired on Exynos boards (built into the board), can be
> enabled as a module. So now we we have to draw the line which is
> "important enough" to built-in and which is not so it could be as module.
>>From my point of view media in general (cameras, tuners etc.) should be
> put in the second category (module), especially that in usual to test
> them you would have to boot system to a full graphical mode. Can you
> test them from SSH connection? Maybe you could test DVB tuners by
> reading status of packets but still output won't be visible.
Ok, my take on it was that if is wired into the board, then it should be
supported out-of-the-box with a zImage build using exynos_defconfig but
I see your point and looks reasonable to me.
I'll wait a couple of days to see if others have more opinions and respin
the patch with these options enabled as a module.
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
> Any comments from other interested parties?
> Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
More information about the linux-arm-kernel