[PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts.

[AKASHI Takahiro]

Jungseok,

On 09/08/2015 01:34 AM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:06 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 07/09/15 16:48, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>>> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:36 PM, James Morse wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>>> Having to handle interrupts on top of an existing kernel stack means the
>>>> kernel stack must be large enough to accomodate both the maximum kernel
>>>> usage, and the maximum irq handler usage. Switching to a different stack
>>>> when processing irqs allows us to make the stack size smaller.
>>>>
>>>> Maximum kernel stack usage (running ltp and generating usb+ethernet
>>>> interrupts) was 7256 bytes. With this patch, the same workload gives
>>>> a maximum stack usage of 5816 bytes.
>>>
>>> I'd like to know how to measure the max stack depth.
>>> AFAIK, a stack tracer on ftrace does not work well. Did you dump a stack
>>> region and find or track down an untouched region?
>>
>> I enabled the 'Trace max stack' option under menuconfig 'Kernel Hacking' ->
>> 'Tracers', then looked in debugfs:/tracing/stack_max_size.
>>
>> What problems did you encounter?
>> (I may be missing something…)
>
> When I enabled the feature, all entries had *0* size except the last entry.
> It can be reproduced easily as looking in debugs:/tracing/stack_trace.

I'm afraid that you have not applied one of patches in my RFC:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355919.html

I have not looked into James' patch in details, but hope that it will help
fix one of issues that are annoying me: Stack tracer (actually save_stack_trace())
will miss a function (and its parent function in some case) that is being executed
when an interrupt is taken.


-Takahiro AKASHI

> You can track down my report and Akashi's changes with the following links:
> - http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354126.html
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/13/29
>
> Although it is impossible to measure an exact depth at this moment, the feature
> could be utilized to check improvement.
>
> Cc'ing Akashi for additional comments if needed.
>
> Best Regards
> Jungseok Lee
>