[PATCH v3 4/6] [media] c8sectpfe: Update binding to reset-gpios

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >> > gpio.txt documents that GPIO properties should be named
> > >> > "[<name>-]gpios", with <name> being the purpose of this
> > >> > GPIO for the device.
> > >> >
> > >> > This change has been done as one atomic commit.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin at linaro.org>
> > >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt | 6 +++---
> > >> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi                          | 4 ++--
> > >> >  drivers/media/platform/sti/c8sectpfe/c8sectpfe-core.c         | 2 +-
> > >> >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt
> > >> > index d4def76..e70d840 100644
> > >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt
> > >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt
> > >> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Required properties (tsin (child) node):
> > >> >
> > >> >  - tsin-num     : tsin id of the InputBlock (must be between 0 to 6)
> > >> >  - i2c-bus      : phandle to the I2C bus DT node which the demodulators & tuners on this tsin channel are connected.
> > >> > -- rst-gpio     : reset gpio for this tsin channel.
> > >> > +- reset-gpios  : reset gpio for this tsin channel.
> > >>
> > >> The documentation is a bit outdated, the GPIO subsystem supports both
> > >> -gpio and -gpios, see commit:
> > >>
> > >> dd34c37aa3e8 ("gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names")
> > >>
> > >> So it makes sense to me to use -gpio instead of -gpios in this case
> > >> since is a single GPIO. Also rst is already a descriptive name since
> > >> that's how many datasheets name a reset pin. I'm not saying I'm
> > >> against this patch, just pointing out since the commit message is a
> > >> bit misleading.
> 
> Ok thanks for pointing that out. It's nice to know the original binding was
> actually OK.

By luck, rather than judgement. ;)

> > > As I suggested this patch, I feel I must comment.
> > >
> > > My order of preference would be:
> > >
> > >  reset-gpio
> > >  reset-gpios
> > >  rst-gpio
> > >  rst-gpios
> > >
> > > This current patch is No2, so it's okay to stay IMHO.
> > >
> > 
> > If the property is being changed anyways, why not going with No1 then?
> 
> I've changed to No1 in v4.

Nice!  Thanks for fixing up.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog