[PATCH v2 2/4] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for ST's Remote Processor Controller driver
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 1 04:49:45 PDT 2015
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre at st.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..fbd7d78
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> > +STMicroelectronics Remote Processor
>>
>> "remote processor" is what STM datasheets call them? This seems like
>> Linux naming is leaking in here.
>
> That's what this directory is called and the other binding within it.
That doesn't make it right or answer my question. Certainly our
directory structure too closely mirrors the kernel.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list