[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: STiH407: Add nodes for RemoteProc

[Peter Griffin]

Hi Lee,

On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre at st.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > index 33daa49..89a363c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > @@ -608,5 +608,53 @@
> > >  			status		= "okay";
> > >  			tx-only;
> > >  		};
> > > +
> > > +		st231_gp0: st231-gp0 at 0 {
> > > +			compatible = "st,st231-rproc";
> > > +			reg = <0x40000000 0x01000000>;
> > > +			reg-names = "carveout";
> > > +			resets = <&softreset STIH407_ST231_GP0_SOFTRESET>;
> > 
> > Support for these co-processor reset lines does not exist upstream. So
> > this series as it stands won't compile.
> 
> That's true.  I have the support as part of some DEBUG patches I have
> in my branch.  Are you aware of a plan for these, or should I upstream
> them myself as part of this set?

I'm not aware of any plan, so I think upstreaming as part of this set
would be good.

regards,

Peter.