[PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration
p.fedin at samsung.com
Thu Oct 29 04:43:15 PDT 2015
> >> Any vendor prefix here? How generic is this?
> > I just don't know... Does *everything* really need a vendor prefix? How readable would that
> be? "compatible" property already says
> > that it's samsung-exynos-specific. And IMHO it's quite obvious that properties of vendor-
> specific device are automatically
> > vendor-specific.
> > Ok, i am currently fixing up the rest and will post v4 soon, and will Cc: it to devicetree
> Which my reply you are referring to? You stripped part of some
> sentence and put it without *any context*. Just random sentence.
> I asked for vendor prefix in few places... srom-timing? width? And I
> do not remember where I used exactly these words.
Ok, sorry, i promise to improve. :)
Anyway, i have figured out how to add sub-devices, and heavily modified the whole thing. And indeed, vendor prefix is now very useful, so i added it to all three properties. Making v4...
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
More information about the linux-arm-kernel