[RFC] rpi: add support to enable usb power domain
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Wed Oct 28 21:32:37 PDT 2015
On 10/28/2015 02:40 PM, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch adds support for RPi several Power Domains and enable support
> to enable the USB Power Domain when it's not enabled before.
>
> This patch based on Eric Anholt's patch to support Power Domains. He had
> an issue about -EPROBE_DEFER inside the power domain subsystem, this
> issue was solved by commit <311fa6a> ("PM / Domains: Return -EPROBE_DEFER
> if we fail to init or turn-on domain").
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.txt
> firmware {
> compatible = "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware";
> mboxes = <&mailbox>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +};
I would have expected a separate DT node for the power domains driver
that referenced the firmware node by phandle. I believe that's why the
firmware node exports mailboxes to other drivers. If the firmware driver
was going to implement all the features directly, it wouldn't need to
act as a mailbox provider, since all the mailbox programming would be
internal.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> +#define RPI_POWER_DOMAIN(_domain, _name) \
> + [_domain] = \
> + { \
I'd expect { wrapped onto the previous line.
> +static int raspberrypi_firmware_set_power(struct rpi_firmware *fw,
> + u32 domain, bool on)
> + packet.on = on;
> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_POWER_STATE, &packet,
> + sizeof(packet));
> + if (!ret && !packet.on)
> + ret = -EINVAL;
The error is only reported for power off requests?
> +/* Asks the firmware to if power is on for a specific power domain. */
> +static int raspberrypi_firmware_power_is_on(struct rpi_firmware *fw,
> + u32 domain)
> + packet.domain = domain;
> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_POWER_STATE, &packet,
> + sizeof(packet));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Hmm. If rpi_firmware_property() returns <0 on error, I'm confused what
the test I commented on above is intended to do.
> +/*
> + * IMPORTANT: be sure this array has no entries which are not specified
> + * between others by RPI_POWER_DOMAIN, otherwise mapping between
> + * generic_pm_domain array doesn't work anymore.
> + */
"has no entries which are not specified between others by
RPI_POWER_DOMAIN" might be better phrased as "is contiguous" or
"contains only contiguous entries".
> @@ -208,15 +312,44 @@ static int rpi_firmware_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) {
> + bool is_off;
> +
> + rpi_power_domains[i].fw = fw;
> + power_domains[i] = &rpi_power_domains[i].base;
> +
> + /* get the initial state */
> + ret = raspberrypi_firmware_power_is_on(fw, i);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto mbox;
The label name "mbox" doesn't give a clue that it's an error handler.
"free_mbox" might be better.
> +mbox:
> + mbox_free_channel(fw->chan);
> + return ret;
> }
Does the pm_genpd_init() call for all the power domains need to be
undone at all?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list