[PATCH V1 11/11] arm64, pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based PCI hostbridge init
Liviu.Dudau at arm.com
Liviu.Dudau at arm.com
Wed Oct 28 04:49:40 PDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:38:42PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Because of two patch series:
> 1. Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host bridge init
> 2. Refactoring of MMCONFIG, part of this patch set
> now we can think about PCI buses enumeration for ARM64 and ACPI tables.
>
> This patch introduce ACPI based PCI hostbridge init calls which
> use information from MCFG table (PCI config space regions) and
> _CRS (IO/irq resources) to initialize PCI hostbridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn at semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com>
> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau at arm.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi at arm.com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 07d1811..bbcc6b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ config ARM64
> select SPARSE_IRQ
> select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM
> help
> ARM 64-bit (AArch64) Linux support.
>
> @@ -202,6 +203,11 @@ source "drivers/pci/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig"
>
> +config PCI_MMCONFIG
> + def_bool y
> + select PCI_ECAM
> + depends on ACPI
> +
> endmenu
>
> menu "Kernel Features"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index b3d098b..66cc1ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/ecam.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include <asm/pci-bridge.h>
> @@ -52,35 +55,216 @@ int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
> + * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT/ACPI when adding a new device
> */
> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + else
> + acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
> +#endif
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pci_root *root = bridge->bus->sysdata;
> +
> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, root->device);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
> +}
> +
> +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void)
> +{
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + pci_assign_unassigned_resources();
> + return 0;
You can change this function into:
{
if (!acpi_disabled)
pci_assign_unassigned_resources();
return 0;
}
as the equivalent but shorter form.
> +}
> /*
> - * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access.
> + * rootfs_initcall comes after subsys_initcall and fs_initcall_sync,
> + * so we know acpi scan and PCI_FIXUP_FINAL quirks have both run.
> */
> -int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
What happened with raw_pci_{read,write} ? Why do you remove them?
> +rootfs_initcall(pcibios_assign_resources);
Would you be so kind and explain to me why you need this initcall?
Can you not set the PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC flag before calling
pci_scan_root_bus() ?
I haven't focused on ACPI before so I'm a bit hazy on the init order when
that is enabled. That being said, I don't like adding in the architecture
code initcall hooks just to fix up some dependency orders that could / should
be fixed some other way.
> +
> +static void __iomem *
> +pci_mcfg_dev_base(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset)
> {
> - return -ENXIO;
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number);
> + if (cfg && cfg->virt)
> + return cfg->virt +
> + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus->number) | (devfn << 12)) +
> + offset;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> -int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
> +struct pci_ops pci_root_ops = {
> + .map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base,
> + .read = pci_generic_config_read,
> + .write = pci_generic_config_write,
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
> +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> {
> - return -ENXIO;
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> + struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> + int seg, start, end, err;
> +
> + root = ci->root;
> + seg = root->segment;
> + start = root->secondary.start;
> + end = root->secondary.end;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, start);
> + if (cfg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_alloc(seg, start, end, root->mcfg_addr);
> + if (!cfg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + err = pci_mmconfig_inject(cfg);
> + return err;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pci_root *root = ci->root;
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(root->segment, root->secondary.start);
> + if (cfg)
> + return;
> +
> + if (cfg->hot_added)
> + pci_mmconfig_delete(root->segment, root->secondary.start,
> + root->secondary.end);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +static int pci_acpi_root_init_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> + return pci_add_mmconfig_region(ci);
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_acpi_root_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> + pci_remove_mmconfig_region(ci);
> + kfree(ci);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> + struct resource *res = entry->res;
> +
> + /*
> + * Special handling for ARM IO range
There is nothing ARM specific here. It should apply to any memory mapped IO range.
> + * TODO: need to move pci_register_io_range() function out
> + * of drivers/of/address.c for both used by DT and ACPI
> + */
> + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> + unsigned long port;
> + int err;
> + resource_size_t length = res->end - res->start;
> +
> + err = pci_register_io_range(res->start, length);
> + if (err) {
> + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + port = pci_address_to_pio(res->start);
> + if (port == (unsigned long)-1) {
> + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + res->start = port;
> + res->end = res->start + length - 1;
> +
> + if (pci_remap_iospace(res, res->start) < 0)
> + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
> + .pci_ops = &pci_root_ops,
> + .init_info = pci_acpi_root_init_info,
> + .release_info = pci_acpi_root_release_info,
> + .prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources,
> +};
> +
> /* Root bridge scanning */
> struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> {
> - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
> - return NULL;
> + int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
> + int domain = root->segment;
> + int busnum = root->secondary.start;
> + struct acpi_pci_root_info *info;
> + struct pci_bus *bus;
> +
> + if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) {
> + pr_warn("PCI %04x:%02x: multiple domains not supported.\n",
> + domain, busnum);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + info = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> + if (!info) {
> + dev_err(&root->device->dev,
> + "pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (out of memory)\n",
> + domain, busnum);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, info, root);
> +
> + /* After the PCI-E bus has been walked and all devices discovered,
> + * configure any settings of the fabric that might be necessary.
> + */
> + if (bus) {
> + struct pci_bus *child;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> + }
> +
> + return bus;
> }
> #endif
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list