[PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver
Srinivas Kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Mon Oct 26 03:39:46 PDT 2015
On 26/10/15 10:28, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:56:24AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>> + .val_bits = 32,
>>> + .reg_stride = 4,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int mtk_efuse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
>>> + struct nvmem_config *econfig;
>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(base))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(base);
>>> +
>>> + econfig = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*econfig), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!econfig)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> Why not use static econfig variable?
>
> Because drivers should not assume there is only one instance of them in
> the system. The qfprom driver does this and it's only a matter of
Good point, Yes, you are right. If MTK has possibility of having more
than one efuse we can leave the code as it is.
> putting a second qcom,qfprom node into the device tree to break the
> driver.
It would indeed.
--srini
>
> Sascha
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list