[PATCH v11 1/6] PCI: designware: move calculation of bus addresses to DRA7xx
Bjorn Helgaas
helgaas at kernel.org
Thu Oct 22 09:35:34 PDT 2015
Hi Gabriele,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:21:41AM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas at kernel.org]
> > > #define PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_PHY_CS 0x010C
> > > #define LINK_UP BIT(16)
> > > +#define CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR 0x0FFFFFFF
> >
> > "CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR" is a very generic name. Since you do have DRA7XX in
> > other #defines and static symbols in this file, maybe it could be DRA7XX to
> > make it obvious that it only applies here?
>
> Ok will change to DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADRR in v12
> ..
> > > + if (pp->io_mod_base)
> > > + pp->io_mod_base &= CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
> >
> > These are equivalent to
> >
> > pp->io_mod_base &= CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
> >
> > (You don't need to test whether they're zero first.)
>
> Yes agreed, will change in v12
> ...
> > > cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
> > > @@ -415,8 +411,7 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > > pp->io_base = range.cpu_addr;
> > >
> > > /* Find the untranslated IO space address */
> > > - pp->io_mod_base = of_read_number(parser.range -
> > > - parser.np + na, ns);
> > > + pp->io_mod_base = range.cpu_addr;
> >
> > So apparently
> >
> > "of_read_number() == range.cpu_addr & CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR" on DRA7xx
> > "of_read_number() == range.cpu_addr" everywhere else?
>
> Yes correct
>
> > Is that right? Is that a valid assumption, i.e., are we assuming
> > anything about DTs in the field that we shouldn't?
>
> Before I wrote a patch that was generic to accommodate intermediate level
> of translation between PCI_addr -> BUS_addr -> CPU_addr
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/360922.html
>
> After discussion we agreed to solve it with a bitmask rather than adding
> a field to of_pci_range to make it generic.
> The bitmask only applies to DRA7xx
I haven't gotten all the way through this series yet, but don't bother with
a v12 just for these minor changes. I can easily fix them up when applying
it.
Bjorn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list