[PATCH 1/4] vfio: platform: add capability to register a reset function
Eric Auger
eric.auger at linaro.org
Tue Oct 20 10:48:44 PDT 2015
Hi Alex,
On 10/19/2015 09:45 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 18:00 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> In preparation for subsequent changes in reset function lookup,
>> lets introduce a dynamic list of reset combos (compat string,
>> reset module, reset function). The list can be populated/voided with
>> two new functions, vfio_platform_register/unregister_reset. Those are
>> not yet used in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 14 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> index e43efb5..d36afc9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>>
>> #include "vfio_platform_private.h"
>>
>> +struct list_head reset_list;
>
> What's the purpose of this one above?
useless indeed
>
>> +LIST_HEAD(reset_list);
>
> static
>
> I think you also need a mutex protecting this list, otherwise nothing
> prevents concurrent list changes and walks. A rw lock probably fits the
> usage model best, but I don't expect much contention if you just want to
> use a mutex.
yes you're right. I am going to use a standard mutex I think.
>
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(driver_lock);
>>
>> static const struct vfio_platform_reset_combo reset_lookup_table[] = {
>> @@ -573,3 +575,56 @@ struct vfio_platform_device *vfio_platform_remove_common(struct device *dev)
>> return vdev;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_remove_common);
>> +
>> +int vfio_platform_register_reset(struct module *reset_owner, char *compat,
>
> const char *
ok
>
>> + vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_platform_reset_node *node, *iter;
>> + bool found = false;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &reset_list, link) {
>> + if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat)) {
>> + found = true;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (found)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + node = kmalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!node)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + node->compat = kstrdup(compat, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!node->compat)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Leaks node
thanks
>
>> +
>> + node->owner = reset_owner;
>> + node->reset = reset;
>> +
>> + list_add(&node->link, &reset_list);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_register_reset);
>> +
>> +int vfio_platform_unregister_reset(char *compat)
>
> const char *
ok
Thanks for your quick review!
Best Regards
Eric
>
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter;
>> + bool found = false;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &reset_list, link) {
>> + if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat)) {
>> + found = true;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (!found)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + list_del(&iter->link);
>> + kfree(iter->compat);
>> + kfree(iter);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_unregister_reset);
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
>> index 1c9b3d5..17323f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
>> @@ -76,6 +76,15 @@ struct vfio_platform_reset_combo {
>> const char *module_name;
>> };
>>
>> +typedef int (*vfio_platform_reset_fn_t)(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev);
>> +
>> +struct vfio_platform_reset_node {
>> + struct list_head link;
>> + char *compat;
>> + struct module *owner;
>> + vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset;
>> +};
>> +
>> extern int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>> struct device *dev);
>> extern struct vfio_platform_device *vfio_platform_remove_common
>> @@ -89,4 +98,9 @@ extern int vfio_platform_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>> unsigned start, unsigned count,
>> void *data);
>>
>> +extern int vfio_platform_register_reset(struct module *owner,
>> + char *compat,
>> + vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset);
>> +extern int vfio_platform_unregister_reset(char *compat);
>> +
>> #endif /* VFIO_PLATFORM_PRIVATE_H */
>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list