[PATCH] PM / OPP: fix debugfs files for 64-bit
Michael Turquette
mturquette at baylibre.com
Mon Oct 19 08:40:09 PDT 2015
Quoting Viresh Kumar (2015-10-08 00:48:28)
> On 07-10-15, 21:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I think it clearly makes sense to have a fixed length for each of these
> > members:
> >
> > either 32 bit is enough to represent all possible values, then
> > there is no need to make them 'long' on 64-bit architectures, or 32 bit
> > is not enough and then the code is broken on 32-bit architectures today
> > and should be fixed.
>
> I agree.
>
> But I am not 100% sure why it was done this way to start with.
> Probably this is the logic behind that:
> - Max clock rate supported by a u32 is ~ 4.295 GHz
> - People expected that, we will not reach this rate for 32 bit systems
> but for 64 bit ones.
> - If above is true, then making it u64 for all will generate not very
> optimized code for 32bit systems, as we need to fetch two 32bit
> values everytime then.
> - And making it u32 for 64 bit systems wouldn't be great as well, as
> we need to mask out half of the read value.
>
> Ofcourse, Mike and Stephen can correct me here :)
I chose unsigned long for the common clock framework _implemenation_,
because the long-standing clk.h _api_ returns this type for clk_get_rate
and passes this type in for clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate.
>
> > In my patch, I assumed that if 32-bit architectures work fine today, then
> > we don't need more range on 64-bit architectures either.
>
> The problem here is that we haven't fixed it properly.
> - clock framework expects it to be unsigned long
> - DT is sending a 64 bit value in Hz
> - But we are storing and exposing it in u32
Don't forget cpufreq is using unsigned int for KHz.
>
> That's weird, isn't it?
Yes it is.
>
> So, either we update clock API and other similar APIs to u64 or u32
> (which may not be the right thing to do), Or we keep it unsigned long
> here as well and add debugfs_create_ulong().
This comes up every now and then. I'm still trying to figure out if
sub-Hertz quantities should be considered (e.g. representing freqs in
milliHertz).
Regards,
Mike
>
> --
> viresh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list