[PATCH 1/2] nvmem: NXP LPC18xx EEPROM memory NVMEM driver
Joachim Eastwood
manabian at gmail.com
Sun Oct 18 14:47:53 PDT 2015
Hi Ariel,
Thanks for working on this.
On 16 October 2015 at 16:07, Ariel D'Alessandro
<ariel at vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
> This commit adds support for NXP LPC18xx EEPROM memory found in NXP LPC
> SoCs family, which includes LPC18xx/LPC43xx. Other SoCs in that family
> may share the same watchdog hardware.
Only LPC185x/3x and LPC435x/3x/2x/1x devices have the EEPROM.
> EEPROM size is 16384 bytes and it can be entirely read and
> written/erased with 1 word (4 bytes) granularity. The last page
> (128 bytes) contains the EEPROM initialization data and is not writable.
>
> Erase/program time is less than 3ms. The EEPROM device requires a
> ~1500 kHz clock (min 800 kHz, max 1600 kHz) that is generated dividing
> the system bus clock by the division factor, contained in the divider
> register (minus 1 encoded).
Nice description of the device.
> +static inline void lpc18xx_eeprom_writel(struct lpc18xx_eeprom_dev *eeprom,
> + u32 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + writel(val, eeprom->reg_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 lpc18xx_eeprom_readl(struct lpc18xx_eeprom_dev *eeprom,
> + u32 reg)
> +{
> + return readl(eeprom->reg_base + reg);
> +}
Read function seems to be unused.
Are these two wrappers really useful?
> +static int lpc18xx_eeprom_gather_write(void *context, const void *reg,
> + size_t reg_size, const void *val,
> + size_t val_size)
> +{
> + struct lpc18xx_eeprom_dev *eeprom = context;
> + unsigned int offset = *(u32 *)reg;
> +
> + /* 3 ms of erase/program time between each writing */
> + while (val_size) {
> + writel(*(u32 *)val, eeprom->mem_base + offset);
> + mdelay(3);
That's a long mdelay. Is it possible to sleep instead?
> + val_size -= eeprom->val_bytes;
> + val += eeprom->val_bytes;
> + offset += eeprom->val_bytes;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int lpc18xx_eeprom_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct lpc18xx_eeprom_dev *eeprom = context;
> + unsigned int offset = eeprom->reg_bytes;
> +
> + BUG_ON(count <= offset);
BUG_ON seems a bit harsh. Could you return an error instead?
> + return lpc18xx_eeprom_gather_write(context, data, eeprom->reg_bytes,
> + data + offset, count - offset);
> +}
...
> +static bool lpc18xx_eeprom_writeable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The last page contains the EEPROM initialization data and is not
> + * writable.
> + */
> + return (reg <= lpc18xx_regmap_config.max_register -
> + LPC18XX_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE);
Unnecessary parenthesis.
> +}
> +
> +static bool lpc18xx_eeprom_readable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + return (reg <= lpc18xx_regmap_config.max_register);
> +}
Unnecessary parenthesis.
> +
> +static struct nvmem_config lpc18xx_nvmem_config = {
> + .name = "lpc18xx-eeprom",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id lpc18xx_eeprom_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "nxp,lpc1850-eeprom" },
Use lpc1857 as noted in the other thread.
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lpc18xx_eeprom_of_match);
regards,
Joachim Eastwood
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list