[PATCH 1/5] media: atmel-isi: correct yuv swap according to different sensor outputs

[Josh Wu]

Dear Gueannadi,

On 10/5/2015 1:04 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Even simpler:
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Josh Wu wrote:
>>
>>> we need to configure the YCC_SWAP bits in ISI_CFG2 according to current
>>> sensor output and Atmel ISI output format.
>>>
>>> Current there are two cases Atmel ISI supported:
>>>    1. Atmel ISI outputs YUYV format.
>>>       This case we need to setup YCC_SWAP according to sensor output
>>>       format.
>>>    2. Atmel ISI output a pass-through formats, which means no swap.
>>>       Just setup YCC_SWAP as default with no swap.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu at atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>   drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c
>>> index 45e304a..df64294 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c
>>> @@ -103,13 +103,41 @@ static u32 isi_readl(struct atmel_isi *isi, u32 reg)
>>>   	return readl(isi->regs + reg);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static u32 setup_cfg2_yuv_swap(struct atmel_isi *isi,
>>> +		const struct soc_camera_format_xlate *xlate)
>>> +{
>> This function will be called only for the four media codes from the
>> switch-case statement below, namely for
>>
>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_VYUY8_2X8
>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8
>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YVYU8_2X8
>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8
>>
>>> +	/* By default, no swap for the codec path of Atmel ISI. So codec
>>> +	* output is same as sensor's output.
>>> +	* For instance, if sensor's output is YUYV, then codec outputs YUYV.
>>> +	* And if sensor's output is UYVY, then codec outputs UYVY.
>>> +	*/
>>> +	u32 cfg2_yuv_swap = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_DEFAULT;
>> Then this ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_DEFAULT will only hold for
>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8? Why don't you just add one more case below? Don't
>> think this initialisation is really justified.
>>
>>> +
>>> +	if (xlate->host_fmt->fourcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV) {
>>> +		/* all convert to YUYV */
>>> +		switch (xlate->code) {
>>> +		case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_VYUY8_2X8:
>>> +			cfg2_yuv_swap = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_3;
>>> +			break;
> Why don't you just return the result value here directly? Then you don't
> need the variable at all

yes, This sounds good. I'll take rid of the cfg2_yuv_swap variable. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
>>> +		case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8:
>>> +			cfg2_yuv_swap = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_2;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YVYU8_2X8:
>>> +			cfg2_yuv_swap = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_1;
>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return cfg2_yuv_swap;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static void configure_geometry(struct atmel_isi *isi, u32 width,
>>> -			u32 height, u32 code)
>>> +		u32 height, const struct soc_camera_format_xlate *xlate)
>>>   {
>>>   	u32 cfg2;
>>>   
>>>   	/* According to sensor's output format to set cfg2 */
>>> -	switch (code) {
>>> +	switch (xlate->code) {
>>>   	default:
>>>   	/* Grey */
>>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y8_1X8:
>>> @@ -117,16 +145,11 @@ static void configure_geometry(struct atmel_isi *isi, u32 width,
>>>   		break;
>>>   	/* YUV */
>>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_VYUY8_2X8:
>>> -		cfg2 = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_3 | ISI_CFG2_COL_SPACE_YCbCr;
>>> -		break;
>>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8:
>>> -		cfg2 = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_2 | ISI_CFG2_COL_SPACE_YCbCr;
>>> -		break;
>>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YVYU8_2X8:
>>> -		cfg2 = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_MODE_1 | ISI_CFG2_COL_SPACE_YCbCr;
>>> -		break;
>>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8:
>>> -		cfg2 = ISI_CFG2_YCC_SWAP_DEFAULT | ISI_CFG2_COL_SPACE_YCbCr;
>>> +		cfg2 = ISI_CFG2_COL_SPACE_YCbCr |
>>> +				setup_cfg2_yuv_swap(isi, xlate);
>>>   		break;
>>>   	/* RGB, TODO */
>>>   	}
>> I would move this switch-case completely inside setup_cfg2_yuv_swap().
>> Just do
>>
>> 	cfg2 = setup_cfg2_yuv_swap(isi, xlate);
>>
>> and handle the
>>
>>   	case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y8_1X8:
>>
>> in the function too. These two switch-case statements really look
>> redundant.
>>
>>> @@ -407,7 +430,7 @@ static int start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
>>>   	isi_writel(isi, ISI_INTDIS, (u32)~0UL);
>>>   
>>>   	configure_geometry(isi, icd->user_width, icd->user_height,
>>> -				icd->current_fmt->code);
>>> +				icd->current_fmt);
>>>   
>>>   	spin_lock_irq(&isi->lock);
>>>   	/* Clear any pending interrupt */
>>> -- 
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>> Thanks
>> Guennadi
>>