[PATCH 5/5] arm: add missing of_node_put
julia.lawall at lip6.fr
Sat Oct 10 14:12:55 PDT 2015
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:15 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The same for_each_child_of_node() loop has three 'return' statements'
> > aside from the 'break' statement here. I think you should change your
> > semantic patch to cover both cases.
> I think Julia's semantic patch covers both cases, but only the cases
> where there is one break or return (though I have essentially zero
> Coccinelle knowledge, this is all based on guessing looking at the
> semantic patch in the cover letter).
Normally, it should be OK with lots of returns. And contrary to my
previous email, even with return;. Will check on it.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel