[PATCH 2/9] pci: mvebu: fix memory leaks and refcount leaks

[Julia Lawall]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 05:14:42PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Julia: some of the Device Tree iterator functions have a somewhat
> > "interesting" behavior in that they take the reference on the current
> > child when entering the loop, and release it before entering the next
> > iteration (which will also take a reference to the next child).
> >
> > This means that if you have an exit point inside the loop (break or
> > return), you are loosing a reference. For example,
> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c#L367
> > is wrong because there is a missing of_node_put(np) before the "return
> > -ENOMEM".
> >
> > So essentially, every exit point in such Device Tree iteration loops
> > should make to call of_node_put() on the current element before exiting
> > the loop unexpectedly.
>
> There is an exception to that... if the loop is part of a DT node lookup
> function, which would return a DT node based on some search criteria, it
> would be valid to break out of the loop while holding a reference.
>
> For example, of_get_child_by_name(), of_find_next_cache_node(),
> of_graph_get_port_by_id(), are valid breaker-outer cases. ;)
>
> However, of_platform_bus_probe(), of_platform_populate(),
> of_overlay_apply_one(), overlay_subtree_check() are examples of
> incorrect break-out cases.

Thanks for the examples.

I guess that this incorrect too, for the opposite reason (double put)?

drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c:

	for_each_child_of_node(np, node) {
                err = of_property_read_u32(node, "nvidia,ram-code",
                                           &node_ram_code);
                if (err) {
                        of_node_put(node);
                        continue;
		}

julia