[PATCH v4] twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally

Mason slash.tmp at free.fr
Thu Oct 8 11:37:23 PDT 2015

On 08/10/2015 20:22, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 19:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:38:53PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>>>> On 08/10/2015 19:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> Otherwise this looks ok. If you can respin with the above wording, and
>>>>> s/twd-never-stops/always-on/ in the patch, you can add:
>>>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>>>> Wouldn't you feel like going all-in and Signing-off? ;-)
>>> Then I'd reject it, because it would be wrong.
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches: [snip]
>> Could someone explain the difference between Acked-by and
>> Reviewed-by?
> Again, I could quote from the above file, but you already have a copy
> of it locally, so you could just read that version instead.  Section 13.

Acked-by: [...] is a record that the acker has at least
reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.

Reviewed-by: indicates that the patch has been reviewed and
found acceptable according to the Reviewer's Statement

IIUC Acked-by is stronger than Reviewed-by?


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list