[PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack
Jungseok Lee
jungseoklee85 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 07:32:43 PDT 2015
On Oct 8, 2015, at 7:25 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi Jungseok,
Hi Pratyush,
>
> On 07/10/2015:03:28:11 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>> Currently, kernel context and interrupts are handled using a single
>> kernel stack navigated by sp_el1. This forces a system to use 16KB
>> stack, not 8KB one. This restriction makes low memory platforms suffer
>> from memory pressure accompanied by performance degradation.
>
> How will it behave on 64K Page system? There, it would take atleast 64K per cpu,
> right?
It would take 16KB per cpu even on 64KB page system.
The following code snippet from kernel/fork.c would be helpful.
----8<----
# if THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE
static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node(struct task_struct *tsk,
int node)
{
struct page *page = alloc_kmem_pages_node(node, THREADINFO_GFP,
THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
return page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
}
static inline void free_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)
{
free_kmem_pages((unsigned long)ti, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
}
# else
static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node(struct task_struct *tsk,
int node)
{
return kmem_cache_alloc_node(thread_info_cache, THREADINFO_GFP, node);
}
static void free_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)
{
kmem_cache_free(thread_info_cache, ti);
}
void thread_info_cache_init(void)
{
thread_info_cache = kmem_cache_create("thread_info", THREAD_SIZE,
THREAD_SIZE, 0, NULL);
BUG_ON(thread_info_cache == NULL);
}
# endif
----8<----
>
>> +int alloc_irq_stack(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + void *stack;
>> +
>> + if (per_cpu(irq_stacks, cpu).stack)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + stack = (void *)__get_free_pages(THREADINFO_GFP, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>
> Above would not compile for 64K pages as THREAD_SIZE_ORDER is only defined for
> non 64K. This need to be fixed.
Thanks for pointing it out! I will update it.
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list