[PATCH v2 4/9] dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver support
Vinod Koul
vinod.koul at intel.com
Wed Oct 7 04:15:31 PDT 2015
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:14:26PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> +static char *fdma_clk_name[CLK_MAX_NUM] = {
> + [CLK_SLIM] = "fdma_slim",
> + [CLK_HI] = "fdma_hi",
> + [CLK_LOW] = "fdma_low",
> + [CLK_IC] = "fdma_ic",
> +};
why do we want to have this sort of data in kernel, we should get the clocks
from DT here
> +static int config_reqctrl(struct st_fdma_chan *fchan)
> +{
> + u32 maxburst = 0, addr = 0;
> + enum dma_slave_buswidth width;
> + int ch_id = fchan->vchan.chan.chan_id;
> + struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = fchan->fdev;
> +
> + if (fchan->scfg.direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> + fchan->cfg.req_ctrl &= ~REQ_CTRL_WNR;
> + maxburst = fchan->scfg.src_maxburst;
> + width = fchan->scfg.src_addr_width;
> + addr = fchan->scfg.src_addr;
> + } else if (fchan->scfg.direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
> + fchan->cfg.req_ctrl |= REQ_CTRL_WNR;
> + maxburst = fchan->scfg.dst_maxburst;
> + width = fchan->scfg.dst_addr_width;
> + addr = fchan->scfg.dst_addr;
This raises red flags, why do we have direction in channel, and where is
this set. Direction belong to a descriptor and you are supposed to use
direction from prep_ calls!
> + if (!is_slave_direction(direction)) {
> + dev_err(fchan->fdev->dev, "bad direction?\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!config_reqctrl(fchan)) {
> + dev_err(fchan->fdev->dev, "bad width or direction\n");
would make sense to print proper error in called fn
> +static enum dma_status st_fdma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> + dma_cookie_t cookie,
> + struct dma_tx_state *txstate)
> +{
> + struct st_fdma_chan *fchan = to_st_fdma_chan(chan);
> + struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
> + enum dma_status ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
> + if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!txstate)
> + return fchan->status;
why channel status and not cookie status ?
> +static const struct st_fdma_ram fdma_mpe31_mem[] = {
> + { .name = "dmem", .offset = 0x10000, .size = 0x3000 },
> + { .name = "imem", .offset = 0x18000, .size = 0x8000 },
> +};
why aren't these coming from DT ?
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ludovic.barre <Ludovic.barre at st.com>");
No MODULE_ALIAS ?
--
~Vinod
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list