[RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion
Andrew
andrew at ncrmnt.org
Wed Oct 7 03:36:37 PDT 2015
On 2015-10-07 02:01, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/6/15 3:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Laura Abbott
>> <labbott at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>> From: Laura Abbott <laura at labbott.name>
>>>
>>>
>>> This adds a base set of devicetree bindings for the Ion memory
>>> manager. This supports setting up the generic set of heaps and
>>> their properties.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <laura at labbott.name>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Andrianov <andrew at ncrmnt.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/android/ion/devicetree.txt | 53
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> I have no issue with this going in here, but I do have lots of issues
>> with this binding.
>>
>>> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/android/ion/devicetree.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/devicetree.txt
>>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/devicetree.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..4a0c941
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/devicetree.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>>> +Ion Memory Manager
>>> +
>>> +Ion is a memory manager that allows for sharing of buffers via
>>> dma-buf.
>>> +Ion allows for different types of allocation via an abstraction
>>> called
>>> +a 'heap'. A heap represents a specific type of memory. Each heap has
>>> +a different type. There can be multiple instances of the same heap
>>> +type.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties for Ion
>>> +
>>> +- compatible: "linux,ion"
>>> +
>>> +All child nodes of a linux,ion node are interpreted as heaps
>>> +
>>> +required properties for heaps
>>> +
>>> +- linux,ion-heap-id: The Ion heap id used for allocation selection
>>> +- linux,ion-heap-type: Ion heap type defined in ion.h
>>> +- linux,ion-heap-name: Human readble name of the heap
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties
>>> +- memory-region: A phandle to a memory region. Required for DMA heap
>>> type
>>> +(see reserved-memory.txt for details on the reservation)
>>> +- linux,ion-heap-align: Alignment for the heap.
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + ion {
>>> + compatbile = "linux,ion";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + ion-system-heap {
>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <0>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_SYSTEM_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "system";
>>
>> How does this vary across platforms? Is all of this being pushed down
>> to DT, because there is no coordination of this at the kernel ABI
>> level across platforms. In other words, why can't heap 0 be hardcoded
>> as system heap in the driver. It seems to me any 1 of these 3
>> properties could be used to derive the other 2.
>>
>
> Right now there is no guarantee heap IDs will be the same across
> platforms. The heap IDs are currently part of the userspace ABI
> as well since userspace clients must pass in a mask of the heap
> IDs to allocate from. If we assume all existing clients could change,
> heaps such as the system heap could be mandated to have the same
> heap ID but we'd still run into problems if you have multiple
> heaps of the same type (e.g. multiple carveouts)
I don't really like the idea of enforcing any IDs here. As of now
heap ids are generally something VERY platform-specific
(or even product-specific). Personally I'd prefer something like this
for userspace apps:
int id1 = ion_get_heap_id("camera");
if (id1 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Invalid heap id");
exit(1);
}
int id2 = ion_get_heap_id("backup-heap");
if (id2 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Invalid heap id");
exit(1);
}
...
int ret = ion_alloc(fd, 0x100, 0x4,
(id1 | id2),
0, &handle);
What concerns kernel stuff, things are simpler - we may just pass the
heap to use
by a reference in devicetree node for that driver. Something like that:
...
ion-decoder-region : region_ddr {
linux,ion-heap-id = <1>;
linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_DMA_HEAP_TYPE>;
linux,ion-heap-name = "decoder_mem"
memory-region = <&camera_region>;
};
...
video_decoder at 80180000 {
compatible = "acme,h266dec";
reg = <0x80180000 0x20000>,
reg-names = "registers";
interrupts = <12>;
interrupt-parent = <&vic1>;
ion-heaps-for-buffers = <&ion-decoder-region>
};
>
> An alternative might be to have each heap just be a compatible string
> and pull everything (id, type etc.) into C files for setup. I debated
> doing that but decided to try putting everything in DT for my first
> pass.
>
>>
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + ion-camera-region {
>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <1>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_DMA_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "camera"
>>> + memory-region = <&camera_region>;
>>
>> Couldn't the memory-region node with addition properties or some
>> standardization of existing ones provide enough information for ION's
>> needs?
>>
>
> I think we could probably derive most of it from the memory-region
> right
> now. If it's reusable, it's DMA, if not it goes to a carveout. Name can
> come from the node name. heap ID and whether or not a region is a chunk
> heap could be added as properties.
>
> We'd still need to be able to get the same information for heaps that
> don't correspond to a specific region like the system heap.
>
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + ion-fb-region {
>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <2>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_DMA_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "fb"
>>> + memory-region = <&fb_region>;
>>> + };
>>> + }
>>> --
>>> 2.4.3
>>>
--
Regards,
Andrew
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list