Dropping "depends on SMP" for HAVE_ARM_TWD -- take 2
balbi at ti.com
Tue Oct 6 14:05:52 PDT 2015
Mason <slash.tmp at free.fr> writes:
> Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Mason wrote:
>>> Did you see my "twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally"
>>> patch? What should I do now for it to be accepted?
>> Assuming you sent it to the correct maintainer from the
>> MAINTAINERS file, I would expect them to apply it directly.
> The patch touches arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> I do not see any entry for arch/arm/kernel in MAINTAINERS.
> This means I should fall back to the generic arch/arm entry, right?
> ARM PORT
> M: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> L: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> W: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
> S: Maintained
> F: arch/arm/
> AFAIU, there is a separate process for submitting patches for arch/arm:
> Russell, Mark Rutland wrote: "Otherwise this looks ok."
> Does that mean I should now submit via the web form?
Mason, please have a read at Russell's patch info . You don't even
need to use the web form.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the linux-arm-kernel