Dropping "depends on SMP" for HAVE_ARM_TWD -- take 2

Felipe Balbi balbi at ti.com
Tue Oct 6 14:05:52 PDT 2015


Mason <slash.tmp at free.fr> writes:
> Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Mason wrote:
>>> Did you see my "twd: Don't set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP unconditionally"
>>> patch? What should I do now for it to be accepted?
>> Assuming you sent it to the correct maintainer from the
>> MAINTAINERS file, I would expect them to apply it directly.
> <confused>
> The patch touches arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> I do not see any entry for arch/arm/kernel in MAINTAINERS.
> This means I should fall back to the generic arch/arm entry, right?
> M:	Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> W:	http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
> S:	Maintained
> F:	arch/arm/
> AFAIU, there is a separate process for submitting patches for arch/arm:
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> Russell, Mark Rutland wrote: "Otherwise this looks ok."
> Does that mean I should now submit via the web form?

Mason, please have a read at Russell's patch info [1]. You don't even
need to use the web form.

[1] http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151006/0580d2ad/attachment.sig>

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list