[PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ
Dave.Martin at arm.com
Tue Oct 6 05:49:02 PDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin at arm.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> writes:
> >> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> >> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> >> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> >> > enough for a couple of function calls".
> >> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ
> >> stack.
> > Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is
> > debatable.
> This is tracked in <https://bugs.python.org/issue22503>.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel