[PATCH 01/18] ARM: am57xx: cl-som-am57x: dts: add basic module support
nm at ti.com
Mon Nov 30 05:36:34 PST 2015
On 11/30/2015 07:29 AM, Dmitry Lifshitz wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 07:06 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 11/29/2015 06:10 AM, Dmitry Lifshitz wrote:
>> You might want to ask your TI support contact for IODelay
>> recommendations. TRM mentions that pinmuxing must be performed under IO
>> isolation. There are silicon constraints in DRA7/AM57xx family, which
>> were not present previously.
> Ok. I understand. This might take time...
> Since we'd like to have this in for 4.5, what would you recommend?
> Should I drop the muxes from this patch set? All the muxes?
> Or should we merge this (as it works correctly) in our tests and check
> on this later after investigation with TI?
> Also, in theory, there might be pins shared between two or more
> different functionalities and remuxed during runtime.
> Can this kind of thing be supported on AM57x?
This is why I suggested to talk and confirm with TI support contact on
this. I understand the motivation of SoM concept, but this requires some
careful designing around.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel