[PATCH v3] clocksource: arm_global_timer: fix suspend resume

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 11/30/2015 02:29 AM, santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com wrote:
> On 11/27/15 11:47 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Now the System stall is observed on TI AM437x based board
>> (am437x-gp-evm) during resuming from System suspend when ARM Global
>> timer is selected as clocksource device (CPUIdle not enabled) - SysRq
>> are working,
>> but nothing else.
>>
>> The reason of stall is that ARM Global timer loses its contexts during
>> System suspend:
>>     GT_CONTROL.TIMER_ENABLE = 0 (unbanked)
>>     GT_COUNTERx = 0
>>
>> Hence, update ARM Global timer driver to reflect above behaviour
>> - re-enable ARM Global timer on resume GT_CONTROL.TIMER_ENABLE = 1.
>>
>> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - dropped all DT specific code
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - suspend/resume simplified: nothing is stored any more and
>>     ARM GT just re-enabled
>> Link on v2:
>>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/20/355
>> Link on v1:
>>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/13/456
>>
> Looks reasonable to me.
>>   drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>> index a2cb6fa..10d1417 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>> @@ -195,12 +195,19 @@ static cycle_t gt_clocksource_read(struct
>> clocksource *cs)
>>       return gt_counter_read();
>>   }
>>
>> +static void gt_resume(struct clocksource *cs)
>> +{
>> +    /* re-enable timer on resume */
>> +    writel(GT_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>
> Check if its disabled before enabling it.
> Other than that,
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh at kernel.org>

Sure, I'll update.

Thanks.
-- 
regards,
-grygorii