[RFC/PATCH 0/3] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Mon Nov 23 16:13:06 PST 2015
On 11/23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for the confirmation.
>
> Summarizing what we've found, I think we can get away with just
> introducing two Kconfig symbols ARCH_MULTI_V7VE and CPU_V7VE.
> Most CPUs fall clearly into one category or the other, and then
> we can allow LPAE to be selected for V7VE-only build but not
> for plain V7, and we can unconditionally build the kernel with
>
> arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7VE) = -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 $(call cc-option,-march=armv7ve,-march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a15)
>
This causes compiler spew for me:
warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a15 conflicts with -march=armv7-a switch
Removing -march=armv7-a from there makes it quiet.
Also, it's sort of feels wrong to have -mcpu in a place where
we're exclusively doing -march. Perhaps the fallback should be
bog standard -march=armv7-a? (or the fallback for that one
"-march=armv5t -Wa$(comma)-march=armv7-a")?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list