[PATCH v3 23/62] acpi/table: Introduce acpi_parse_entries
Jan Beulich
JBeulich at suse.com
Mon Nov 23 08:56:10 PST 2015
>>> On 17.11.15 at 10:40, <shannon.zhao at linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit at linaro.org>
>
> Add new function acpi_parse_entries which takes acpi table as argument.
> This will avoid fetching table everytime in acpi_table_parse_entries.
> This function will be used in acpi_gicv2_init within another patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat <Naresh.Bhat at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
Please clarify authorship: From and first S-o-b aren't really in line.
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -221,29 +221,27 @@ void __init acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct
> acpi_subtable_header *header)
> }
> }
>
> -
> int __init
> -acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
> - unsigned long table_size,
> - int entry_id,
> - acpi_table_entry_handler handler,
> - unsigned int max_entries)
> +acpi_parse_entries(char *id,
> + unsigned long table_size,
> + acpi_table_entry_handler handler,
> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
> + int entry_id,
> + unsigned int max_entries)
> {
> - struct acpi_table_header *table_header = NULL;
Looks like Linux has gained similar functionality. Can't you simply
pull in one or more Linux commits?
> - if (!handler)
> + if ( !handler )
But in any event please don't change the file's coding style.
Jan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list