[PATCH] ARM: imx6: pm: declare pm domain latency on power_state struct.

Lucas Stach l.stach at pengutronix.de
Mon Nov 23 05:31:00 PST 2015


Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2015, 07:57 -0700 schrieb Lina Iyer:
> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas at baylibre.com>
> 
> The generic_pm_domain structure uses an array of latencies to be able to
> declare multiple intermediate states.
> 
> Declare a single "OFF" state with the default latencies So that the
> power_off_latency_ns and power_on_latency_ns fields of generic_pm_domain
> structure can be eventualy removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas at baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org>
> [Lina: pm_genpd_init() argument change]
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 8e7976a..b070e06 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -368,13 +368,23 @@ static struct generic_pm_domain imx6q_arm_domain = {
>  	.name = "ARM",
>  };
>  
> +static struct genpd_power_state imx6q_arm_domain_states[] = {

Those states are for the PU, not the ARM domain.

> +	{
> +		.name = "OFF",
> +		.power_off_latency_ns = 25000,
> +		.power_on_latency_ns = 2000000,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  static struct pu_domain imx6q_pu_domain = {
>  	.base = {
>  		.name = "PU",
>  		.power_off = imx6q_pm_pu_power_off,
>  		.power_on = imx6q_pm_pu_power_on,
> -		.power_off_latency_ns = 25000,
> -		.power_on_latency_ns = 2000000,
> +		.gov = NULL,
> +		.status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF,

The above 2 lines should not be needed. This is a static struct, so .gov
will already be NULL. status is set by pm_genpd_init() and the above
value is actively wrong.

> +		.states = imx6q_arm_domain_states,
> +		.state_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx6q_arm_domain_states),
>  	},
>  };
>  

How urgent is this patch? I have a series to rework the GPC driver
almost ready and I could fold this change in directly if it's okay for
this to sit through a review of the rework.

Regards,
Lucas
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.             | Lucas Stach                 |
Industrial Linux Solutions   | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list