[PATCH v2 0/6] Switch to generic syscon regmap based drivers

Alim Akhtar alim.akhtar at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 10:06:08 PST 2015

Hi Krzysztof/Ulf/Kukjin

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski at samsung.com> wrote:
> On 22.10.2015 00:01, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> <javier at osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Alim,
>>> On 10/21/2015 04:50 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>> [0]:
>>>>> From c9b250ee03bae338339b70693e906145c719f783 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:59:44 +0200
>>>>> Subject: [RFT PATCH] mmc: pwrseq: Use highest priority for eMMC restart
>>>>>  handler
>>>>> The pwrseq_emmc driver does a eMMC card reset before a system reboot to
>>>>> allow broken or limited ROM boot-loaders, that don't have an eMMC reset
>>>>> logic, to be able to read the second stage from the eMMC.
>>>>> But this has to be called before a system reboot handler and while most
>>>>> of them use the priority 128, there are other restart handlers (such as
>>>>> the syscon-reboot one) that use a higher priority. So, use the highest
>>>>> priority to make sure that the eMMC hw is reset before a system reboot.
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>> Looks good.
>>>> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar at samsung.com>
> +Cc Ulf,
> Javier,
> First of all, thanks Javier for digging into the issue. Actually I have
> Odroid U3 but because of user-space limitations (which I need for other
> work) I cannot test all of mainline patches there.
>>> Thanks, should I post it as a proper patch or are adding it to your
>>> series?
>> Suggest you to post as a patch collecting {Tested, Reviewed}-by (easy
>> for maintainers to pickup ) and probably CCing Ulf for his feedback.
>>> I think the latter is more reasonable so with an ack from Ulf,
>>> all patches can go through the linux-samsung tree.
>> yes, that is reasonable, as I said, let Krzysztof and Ulf take a call here.
> Javier, Alim, Ulf,
> I am not grabbing any more patches for v4.4 because I doubt that they
> could be merged to arm-soc for this cycle. My last pull requests for
> v4.4 is still pending...
> This means that I plan to pick up these series for v4.5, after closing
> v4.4 merge window (unless Kukjin picks it also). Because of that, we
> have plenty of time, so my idea is:
> 1. Wait for some comments from Ulf on Javier's fix.
> 2. If the fix goes into v4.4, then problem solved.
> 3. If not and it get acked, then it can go with this set.
> 4. If not and it get applied by Ulf for v4.5, then a tag from him would
> be a nice way to solve dependency.
> Either way we don't have to hurry, I think.

Is It the right time to get this series in?

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list