[PATCH v9 2/2] arm-soc: Add support for tango4 platforms
Marc Gonzalez
marc_gonzalez at sigmadesigns.com
Thu Nov 19 09:24:50 PST 2015
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Add support for Sigma Designs ARM-based Tango4 "Secure Media Processor"
>> platforms (i.e. smp8734, smp8756, smp8758, smp8759) built around the
>> Cortex-A9 MPCore r3p0 (all dual-core, except the 8756).
>>
>> Support for older MIPS-based platforms can be found elsewhere:
>> https://github.com/mansr/linux-tangox
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez at sigmadesigns.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
>> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-tangox/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-tangox/Makefile | 2 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-tangox/setup.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-tangox/smc.S | 9 +++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-tangox/smc.h | 5 +++++
>
> Potential bike-shed fodder, but, a dumb question: is the family name
> actually "tangox" or is the "x" for the number (tango3, tango4, etc.)
>
> Assuming it's the later based on usage throughout the patch, I think
> it'd be better to just use "tango" throughout instead of tangox.
I should just change tangox to tango everywhere?
This port supports tango4. I will submit a tango5 port in 2016.
Does that change anything?
> Also a MAINTAINERS file entry is appropriate for this new platform
> support (as scripts/checkpatch.pl should have told you.)
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll send a v10.
Are these the only issues in your opinion?
Regards.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list