[PATCH v6 06/19] arm64:ilp32: share signal structures between ILP32 and LP64 ABIs
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Nov 17 14:14:25 PST 2015
On Wednesday 18 November 2015 00:16:46 Yury Norov wrote:
>
> +/* For ILP32, sigset should be the same size fields as LP64 so use
> + unsigned long long. */
> +#ifdef __ILP32__
> +#define __SIGSET_INNER_TYPE __extension__ unsigned long long
> +#define _NSIG_BPW 64
> +
> +# ifdef __AARCH64EB__
> +# define __SIGNAL_INNER(type, field) \
> + __extension__ struct { \
> + int __pad_##field; \
> + type field; \
> + } __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> +# else
> +# define __SIGNAL_INNER(type, field) \
> + __extension__ struct { \
> + type field; \
> + int __pad_##field; \
> + } __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> +# endif
> +
> +# define __SIGACTION_HANDLER(field) \
> + __SIGNAL_INNER(__sighandler_t, field)
> +
> +#define __SIGACTION_FLAGS(field) \
> + __extension__ unsigned long long field
> +
> +#define __SIGACTION_RESTORER(field) \
> + __SIGNAL_INNER(__sigrestore_t, field)
> +
> +#endif
Ah, I missed that in the comments for patch 14. I would think that
it makes sense to share siginfo_t with the 64-bit version, when the
normal compat_siginfo_t doesn't work, but I see no point in
changing compat_sigset_t: There is nothing architecture specific
in that, so you can just use the arm32 version of that, which simplifies
both the kernel and libc sides.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list