[PATCH v3 61/62] arm/acpi: Add acpi parameter to enable/disable acpi

Shannon Zhao zhaoshenglong at huawei.com
Tue Nov 17 04:57:37 PST 2015


Hi,

On 2015/11/17 20:26, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Shannon,
> 
> I would have appreciate if you I had looked on comments made on the
> series sent by Parth.
> 
I do look. But I didn't find "Follow-Ups" ones at [1]. And among the
mails which Parth forwarded to me there is no [PATCH v2 37/41]. This is
werid.

[1]http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02227.html

> On 17/11/15 09:41, shannon.zhao at linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit at linaro.org>
>>
>> ACPI will be disabled by default. Define new command line parameter
>> "acpi" for enabling it.
> 
> I don't think this is right. We have to be able to boot platform where
> there is only ACPI provided without adding a command line option.
> 
> Overall, it would be better if we follow the same behavior as Linux i.e
> ACPI is enabled instead of DT unless:
>         - ACPI has been disabled (acpi=off)
>         - the DT is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node) and
> ACPI has not been forced to be enabled (acpi=force).
> 
Ok, will add this.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> index 63feadf..1a40323 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ static unsigned long opt_xenheap_megabytes __initdata;
>>  integer_param("xenheap_megabytes", opt_xenheap_megabytes);
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +/* "acpi=force" : Enables acpi */
>> +static void parse_acpi_param(char *s);
>> +custom_param("acpi", parse_acpi_param);
>> +
>>  static __used void init_done(void)
>>  {
>>      free_init_memory();
>> @@ -84,6 +88,23 @@ static const char * __initdata processor_implementers[] = {
>>      ['i'] = "Intel Corporation",
>>  };
>>  
>> +static char __initdata acpi_param[10] = "";
>> +static void __init parse_acpi_param(char *s)
>> +{
>> +    /* Save the parameter so it can be propagated to domain0. */
>> +    safe_strcpy(acpi_param, s);
> 
> This acpi_param is never used within this series. Please drop it or
> either implement what the comment claim.
> 
>> +
>> +    /* Interpret the parameter for use within Xen. */
>> +    if ( !parse_bool(s) )
>> +    {
>> +        disable_acpi();
>> +    }
>> +    else if ( !strcmp(s, "force") )
>> +    {
>> +        acpi_disabled = 0;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void __init processor_id(void)
>>  {
>>      const char *implementer = "Unknown";
>> @@ -729,6 +750,7 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
>>          + (fdt_paddr & ((1 << SECOND_SHIFT) - 1));
>>      fdt_size = boot_fdt_info(device_tree_flattened, fdt_paddr);
>>  
>> +    disable_acpi();
>>      cmdline = boot_fdt_cmdline(device_tree_flattened);
>>      printk("Command line: %s\n", cmdline);
>>      cmdline_parse(cmdline);
>>
> 
> Regards,
> 

-- 
Shannon




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list