[PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply
Ludovic Desroches
ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
Mon Nov 9 05:14:37 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> This doesn't seems like a case where a gpio regulator should be used
> >> and I am not sure what problem it would solve. Beside to suppress the
> >> log warnings (actually those aren't warnings but informations).
> >>
> >> Isn't sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch() doing what you need here?
> >>
> >
> > It is. I am only wondering the best way to describe the hardware:
> > - No regulator but I have the 'no vqmmc regulator not found' message which
> > is a bit annoying and which can be interpreted as an issue for someone
> > who has no knowledge about this stuff.
>
> Hmm, should we turn them into debug messages? Both regulators are optional.
>
I think so. From my point of view, it is useless to indicate that
something optionnal is missing.
> > - Describe the regulator since there is one on my board. But it is not a
> > fixed regulator and even if it's close to a gpio one it is not.
>
> If it's driven by SDHCI internal logic, I would leave it to that.
> There are no need to describe it at all.
Ok thanks for your help.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list