[PATCH V3 2/4] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver
Sinan Kaya
okaya at codeaurora.org
Sun Nov 8 18:17:20 PST 2015
On 11/8/2015 12:08 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 11/8/2015 12:08 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> + val = val & ~(MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS);
>> + val = val | (mgmtdev->max_write_request << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS);
>> + val = val & ~(MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK);
>> + val = val | (mgmtdev->max_read_request);
>
> val &= ~MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS;
> val |= mgmtdev->max_write_request << MAX_BUS_WR_REQ_BIT_POS;
> val &= ~MAX_BUS_REQ_LEN_MASK;
> val |= mgmtdev->max_read_request;
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id hidma_mgmt_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt", },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.0", },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.1", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>
> I thought Rob said that he did NOT want to use version numbers in
> compatible strings. And what's the difference between these three
> versions anyway?
>
This was already discussed here.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/689
The agreement was to use
compatible = "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.1", "qcom,hidma-mgmt-1.0",
"qcom,hidma-mgmt";
I'll be adding code for v1.1 specifically in the future.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list