[PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
Shi, Yang
yang.shi at linaro.org
Fri Nov 6 09:55:54 PST 2015
On 11/6/2015 9:51 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:39:07AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
>> On 11/6/2015 9:35 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:23:38AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
>>>> On 11/6/2015 8:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>> However, the patch would allow one to
>>>>> disable FRAME_POINTERS (not sure it has any effect on the aarch64 gcc
>>>>> though).
>>>>
>>>> No, it doesn't. Actually, FRAME_POINTER could be disabled regardless of the
>>>> patch.
>>>
>>> In which case I suggest that we always select it just as a clearer
>>> statement that the feature cannot be disabled (and you never know what
>>> the compiler people decide to do in the future).
>>
>> Do you mean select FRAME_POINTER in ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS?
>>
>> Yes, we could, but this may cause other architectures which select
>> ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS to have FRAME_POINTER selected too.
>
> This would have been the ideal option, something like:
>
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ config ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> help
>
> config FRAME_POINTER
> - bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
> + bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" if !ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \
> (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \
> AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \
>
> But, as you said, we would need to check the other architectures
> selecting ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS.
How about:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 1d1521c..709255a 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
#
config ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
bool
+ select FRAME_POINTER if ARM64
help
config FRAME_POINTER
If other architectures want the same behavior, they could easily append
to the is statement. If all arches which selects
ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS, the if statement could be just removed.
Yang
>
> In the meantime:
>
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config ARM64
> select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
> select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
> select EDAC_SUPPORT
> + select FRAME_POINTER
> select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list