[PATCH RFC 7/7] irqchip: [Example] dummy wired interrupt/MSI bridge driver
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Thu Nov 5 01:35:45 PST 2015
On 05/11/15 08:25, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Marc
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Marc Zyngier
>> Sent: 04 November 2015 09:04
>> To: majun (F); Thomas Gleixner; Jiang Liu; Jason Cooper
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 7/7] irqchip: [Example] dummy wired interrupt/MSI
>> bridge driver
>>
>> On 04/11/15 08:00, majun (F) wrote:
[...]
>>> I think,for a interrupt controller, msichip driver initialization maybe is
>> too late
>>> for some devices which connect to this irqchip if we use
>> module_platform_driver.
>>
>> That's a consequence of this design. This is why I insisted on the fact
>> that this is currently avoided by using deferred probe in drivers, and
>
> Mmm using te deferred probe would mean to rework all the drivers of the
> potential devices connected to mbi-gen...would that be sustainable/acceptable?
I'm tempted to reply "Not my problem". Or rather, not a problem I'm
trying to solve right now (or any time soon).
I'm pretty sure that sprinkling -EPROBE_DEFER on all possible drivers
will result in a resounding NAK, which is is why I suggested that
someone with a vested interest dedicates some quality time helping those
who are trying to solve this issue for good.
>> that it should be solved by having a probe order. Either way, this is
>> not something that we can solve at that level (see the multiple proposal
>> for this on the various lists).
>
> Could you point me to the relevant discussions for this...?
Google is, as always, your dearest friend. But here you go:
- LWN has some quality coverage of the KS discussions (assuming you're a
subscriber, otherwise you'll have to wait for another week):
http://lwn.net/Articles/662820/
- There is also Tomeu Vizoso's series, which itself builds upon other
previous attempts at solving this: https://lwn.net/Articles/658690/
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list